L, on 31 December 2011 - 07:19 AM, said:
Civ: Macedonians (Macedones, Seleucids, Ptolemies)
#41
Posted 31 December 2011 - 07:24 AM
Wildfire Games Project Leader
Contact me: michaeldhafer[at]gmail.com
Support Wildfire Games!
#42
Posted 31 December 2011 - 07:46 AM
Edited by L'ethu, 31 December 2011 - 08:16 AM.
#43
Posted 31 December 2011 - 08:04 AM
Wildfire Games Project Leader
Contact me: michaeldhafer[at]gmail.com
Support Wildfire Games!
#44
Posted 31 December 2011 - 08:18 AM
Edited by L'ethu, 31 December 2011 - 08:25 AM.
#45
Posted 31 December 2011 - 08:24 AM
L, on 31 December 2011 - 08:18 AM, said:
Right, so they are trained with Elite stats from the get-go and don't have promotions, while gaining citizen-soldier ability to gather and build.
Wildfire Games Project Leader
Contact me: michaeldhafer[at]gmail.com
Support Wildfire Games!
#46
Posted 31 December 2011 - 08:29 AM
Historically these unit are prone to rebellion and the Ptolemies decided to recruit foreign soldiers than using native Egyptian in large number, by giving a half status to these unit could somehow portray the nature of these unit.
But after all it is you and the team makes the decision, i am but a community enthusiast that wait to play the game after all.
Edited by L'ethu, 31 December 2011 - 09:14 AM.
#47
Posted 07 January 2012 - 09:51 PM
If yes, why? Macedonians are Hellenes, i don't see why separate them for the spartans, the Cretans etc. .....
#48
Posted 07 January 2012 - 10:10 PM
TheLyraki, on 07 January 2012 - 09:51 PM, said:
If yes, why? Macedonians are Hellenes, i don't see why separate them for the spartans, the Cretans etc. .....
Well, technically the Macedonians weren't Hellenes, although they were significantly influenced by Hellenic culture. That's not to say they didn't want to be considered Hellenes, though.
#49
Posted 07 January 2012 - 10:44 PM
TheLyraki, on 07 January 2012 - 09:51 PM, said:
If yes, why? Macedonians are Hellenes, i don't see why separate them for the spartans, the Cretans etc. .....
The idea is to make the Macedonian civ represent the Hellenistic Sucessor States, with the pre-Alexandrian Hellenic (Greek) states represented by a revamped Hellenes faction.

Platon - it's like Communism without the noble goal.
#50
Posted 01 February 2012 - 09:42 PM
Quote
The Helepolis can or not garrison?
Latin: Petrus Falco; Literally means 'Stone Hawk'.
English equivalent: ' Peter ';
Undergraduate Computer Scientist by UFCG
Shotokan Karate Adept, 3rd Kyu (Green Belt) & Muay Thai initiate
#51
Posted 01 February 2012 - 09:53 PM
Pedro Falcão, on 01 February 2012 - 09:42 PM, said:
The Helepolis can or not garrison?
Erik Johansson [ aka feneur ]
Wildfire Games
Contact me: feneur@wildfiregames.com
Support Wildfire Games!
#52
Posted 02 February 2012 - 02:25 AM
#53
Posted 26 February 2012 - 11:05 AM

Platon - it's like Communism without the noble goal.
#54
Posted 23 March 2012 - 04:31 PM
L, on 31 December 2011 - 08:29 AM, said:
Historically these unit are prone to rebellion and the Ptolemies decided to recruit foreign soldiers than using native Egyptian in large number, by giving a half status to these unit could somehow portray the nature of these unit.
But after all it is you and the team makes the decision, i am but a community enthusiast that wait to play the game after all.
I'm not sure if I'm educated enough to give an opinion on the Ptolemies but didn't they use Galatians and some form of Squadron(Agryspidai/Hypapist as examples) as their elite?
Quote
Edited by Gothic, 23 March 2012 - 04:32 PM.
#55
Posted 19 April 2012 - 10:59 AM
#56
Posted 27 June 2012 - 12:28 AM
A levy phalangitai, a medium land owner phalangitai and agyraspidai (yeah silver instead of bronze shields) would be ideal for the Seleukids. Though they don't need to come in a phalangitai version only.
Makedonians obviously could have some Thracians (phalxes) as uniques, the agrianians are perfect for light skirmishers as they are (just noticed them), but a heavy skirmisher could possibly be added as well.
Other agema and royal units would be the obvious hetairoi and hypaspistai. Though the latter should perhaps not be avaible to the Ptolemaics.
Edit:
Cleopatra VII on a chariot? Isn't that a very heavy anachronistic? Also weird pick for hero, but okay.
Edited by Moros, 27 June 2012 - 12:35 AM.
#57
Posted 27 June 2012 - 06:09 AM
Wildfire Games Project Leader
Contact me: michaeldhafer[at]gmail.com
Support Wildfire Games!
#58
Posted 24 August 2012 - 06:02 AM
#59
Posted 24 August 2012 - 01:17 PM
#60
Posted 24 August 2012 - 05:25 PM
- because it was the greatest store of knowledge in the Ancient World
- it's more awe-inspiring than a lighthouse (it may have been huge, but thats really all that the Pharos Lighthouse definitively was)
- it's named after the most famous Macedonian in history (technically, it's for the city named after Alexander, but same difference
) - in the context of the game and random maps, you could reason that "Alexandria" is anywhere and not necessarily in Egypt, thus whatever city you build the Library in can be considered "Alexandria"
- while it's not one of the Wonders of the Ancient World, it's more evocative of the Ancient World than the Lighthouse is (it would largely be important that alot of the actual Wonders of the World not be included because alot of them either don't fall into the timeframe of 0 AD or the civilizations which built them are not playable, like the Egyptians or Babylonians)
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











