Oathbreakers Have we missed a civilization?
#1
Posted 29 July 2005 - 08:00 AM
Has there been a decision not to include the Oathbreakers, or have they truly slipped through the cracks?
#2
Posted 29 July 2005 - 08:58 AM
so we could use them as a Minor Civ in the Second Age with some heavy-scripting to make their appearance as unique as possible.
and no - there hasn't been a decision yet to not include them, but since our current activities mainly concentrate on the First Age, i guess their time hasn't yet come.
The Last Alliance Project Co-Leader, Ardaquenta Admin
Contact me: enarwaen@wildfiregames.com
Visit Ardaquenta - our community driven Encyclopedia on all things Arda!
#3
Posted 29 July 2005 - 12:57 PM
#4
Posted 29 July 2005 - 02:19 PM
The Last Alliance Administrative Assistant
Contact me: dathui@wildfiregames.com
My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
#5
Posted 29 July 2005 - 05:42 PM
Quote
I would assume they would be in the Second Age.
They are important in the Third Age as well, and they certainly should be present as units, but the Army of the Dead is hardly a civilization, even a minor one. You can't trade with them, they only exist for one battle before being released to rest...
#6
Posted 29 July 2005 - 11:18 PM
This post has been edited by Caedus: 29 July 2005 - 11:18 PM
The Last Alliance Semi-active TLA forumer (philosophy student)
Quote
~ Priscilla and John Tolkien, The Tolkien Family Album, Houghton Mifflin Co., 1992, p. 58.
#7
Posted 30 July 2005 - 04:12 AM
Off-Topic: Is Dunland a minor civ?
#8
Posted 30 July 2005 - 06:47 PM
The curse goes "you shall be the last King," etcetera etcetera. Certainly these men would have had wives and children (or at the very least mothers), but you never hear a word of them. The curse that the King in question should be their last, however, implies the end of their civilization. Presumably the women and children are either cursed with infertility, fated to be conquered and assimilated/exterminated by somebody else (I would guess Gondor is most likely), or something like that.
Yes - the Dunlandings are also left out, haven't they... for that matter, so are the Variags of Khand...
#9
Posted 01 August 2005 - 03:59 PM
#10
Posted 01 August 2005 - 05:50 PM
Quote
errm - don't put too much weight on things that are on the website and those that are not ...
The Last Alliance Project Co-Leader, Ardaquenta Admin
Contact me: enarwaen@wildfiregames.com
Visit Ardaquenta - our community driven Encyclopedia on all things Arda!
#11
Posted 05 August 2005 - 08:55 AM
And since Tolkien seems such a women hater
'Shouldn't we send him a message and call in his help?' Erestor asked. 'It seems that he even has control of the Ring.'
'No, I shouldn't say it that way,' Gandalf said. 'Rather say the Ring hasn't got control of him. He's his own master. But he can't change the ring, nor break the power it has on others.'
No, my name isn't wrong, it's just a combination of Mithrandir and Mithril: look and see: MITHRandI(L/R)
"One can only discuss when he can find reason in the other's thoughts, and then still disagree. When one cannot, he argues" -Noilos
"One is intelligent when one wields the following things: critisism on everything, and keen logics in it's purest form" -Noilos
"Philosophy poses the question why, History answers it" -Noilos
#12
Posted 05 August 2005 - 09:32 PM
The Last Alliance Semi-active TLA forumer (philosophy student)
Quote
~ Priscilla and John Tolkien, The Tolkien Family Album, Houghton Mifflin Co., 1992, p. 58.

Sign In »
Register Now!
Help











