Light Style© by Fisana

Jump to content


Photo

New Release: 0 A.D. Alpha 10 Jhelum

New Releases Alpha 10 Jhelum

  • Please log in to reply
30 replies to this topic

#1 Jeru

Jeru

    Factotum

  • Web Development Team
  • 4,971 posts

Posted 16 May 2012 - 01:05 PM

Wildfire Games, an international group of volunteer game developers, proudly announces the release of "0 A.D. Alpha 10 Jhelum", the tenth alpha version of 0 A.D., a free, open-source game of ancient warfare. This alpha features Hellenic factions such as Athens, Macedonia and Sparta; technologies, civilization phases, click-and-drag walls, healing and more!


Easy Download and Install


Download and installation instructions are available for Windows, Linux and Mac OS X. 0 A.D. is free of charge and always will be. You can redistribute it and modify it as long as you abide by the GPL. You can even use parts of the art and sound for your own projects as long as you abide by CC-BY-SA. No "freemium" model, no in-game advertising, no catch.


Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image

Top new gameplay features in this release:
  • New Hellenic Factions: Athenians, Macedonians and Spartans will now replace the generic Hellenic faction. Each features some unique characteristics along with shared Hellenic units and buildings:
    • Receiving significant naval bonuses, the Athenians are the rulers of the waves. Special Buildings: Gymnaseion, Prytaneion ("Council Chamber") and Theatron.
    • Macedonians have a wide selection of units and siege engines, for a combined arms approach. Special buildings (in planning): Lighthouse and library.
    • The Spartans can't build stone walls, but as their soldiers are top-notch, their men serve as their walls instead. Special Building: Syssiton ("Military Mess Hall").
    (Also, along the same lines, we have decided to include more factions in 0 A.D., beginning with the Mauryan Indians! Read on to find out how you can help.)
  • Basic Technologies: Technologies, or techs, are economic or military bonuses that can be "researched" (bought) for resources at designated buildings. In 0 A.D., technologies come in mutually exclusive pairs: Within each pair, you can either research one tech or the other, but not both in the same game. As researching some technologies depends on having researched others, one should plan ahead carefully. (Importantly, for the meantime, all factions share an identical tech tree, but over the next few releases, different factions will get different tech trees, adding complexity and interest to the game.)
  • Civilization Phases: Start in Village, upgrade to Town, then to City. Unlock new techs and expand your territory with each upgrade.
  • Click-and-drag wall building functionality. (Support for gates is due in a future release.)
  • Healing units from their battle wounds is now possible by a priest conducting a ceremony with special chants within range. Priests can be trained at the Temple.
  • The Iberians get a pre-built walled settlement as a bonus every game.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5oxZKaSfk4

Graphics improvements:
  • New Models/Artwork:
    • Roman Siege Walls, Prytaneion, Roman Merchant Ship;
    • Iberian Special Building, Temple and Fortress; Remodeled Iberian Civ Center
    • Remodeled Hellenic barracks and market
    • Updated/Remodeled all walls
    • New hand-drawn Greek unit portraits
  • Prettier unit/building selection rings
  • Refactored rendering engine, supports the new specular effect.
  • New graphics options: Ability to disable particles and unit silhouettes in game, which gives small boost to game's FPS if needed (Thanks, rouge-spectre and mk12)

Posted ImagePosted Image
Posted ImagePosted Image

From top left: 1. Specularity; 2. Celtic walls and revamped selection rings; 3,4. "Drag" (3) and "drop" (4) to build all types of walls, including Roman siege walls pictured. All works CC BY SA Wildfire Games.

  • 9+ New maps, including: Acropolis 5, Laconia 1, and Punjab 3 (scenario maps) and Deep Forest (a random map).
  • New music tracks: "In the Shadow of Olympus" (Hellenic) and a generic victory track.

  • Usability Improvements:
    • Training units with multiple buildings of the same type selected trains that unit in all selected buildings
    • Several UI changes in bartering and setting units' formation and stance
    • It is now easier to select multiple control groups (by Shift+N, where N is the control group number, or by shift-clicking the control group icons) (Thanks, mk12)
    • Shift-clicking a garrisoned unit now ungarrisons all units of that type
  • Atlas & Random Map Script Improvements:
    • Terrain eyedropper tool
    • Several bug fixes improving display and stability
    • New wall generation tool for random maps (Thanks, FeXoR)
  • Bug fixes and minor features:
    • Refactored AI API, setting the groundwork for developers to reduce lag and program faster, smarter computer opponents in the future.
    • Attack restrictions: Soldiers can't attack stone walls, women can't attack soldiers, animals can't attack buildings, and more. (Thanks, ZsoL)
    • New "Random" faction option for random maps (Thanks, deebee)
    • Increased support for Linux and Mac on several accounts (Thanks, ZsoL)
    • Control groups are now persisted between save/load (Thanks, mk12)
    • Fixed several gameplay & AI bugs (Thanks, mattlott, Dietger, MattDoerksen)
    • New data paths on Windows and OS X (Windows: "%appdata%\0ad" and "%localappdata%\0ad"; Mac: "~/Library/Application Support/0ad").

Please contribute! (REPORTERS/BLOGGERS, PLEASE MENTION THIS! We need your help to finish the game. Thanks.)


We are especially seeking contributors in sound contribution management and in documentation, and, as always, in programming, art, sound, taking YouTube videos and more. These roles on the 0 A.D. development team are great if you want to brush up on your skills and update your portfolio, if you're seeking a project for school with real-life applications, or if you care about the cause of free culture and software and are willing to work pro bono with a group of dedicated volunteers from all over the world.


Specifically, we invite contributors to guide us in ancient Indian history and architecture as we collaboratively design the Mauryan Indian faction in 0 A.D.


Interested? Please register on our forums and start participating! (If you are applying for a role on the team, we request you start a thread in the applications and contributions forum following these instructions. Thanks!)


Why "Jhelum"?


We name our releases according to development status ("Alpha" or "Beta"), successive release number (1, 2, 3, ...) and a word relating to the ancient world, in alphabetical order ("Argonaut" for A, "Bellerophon" for B, ...).


"Jhelum" is the Indian name for the Hydaspes River in the Punjab region, and the site of a major battle between Alexander the Great against King Porus of the Hindu Paurava kingdom in 326 BC, located in modern-day Pakistan. Alexander victored, but at a heavy cost, and the bravery, war skills and princely attitude of Porus so impressed Alexander, he allowed him to rule Hydaspes in Alexander's name.


In honor of the decision to include Mauryan Indians in 0 A.D., we decided to dub Alpha 10 "Jhelum". (Thanks for the name idea, zaphzaph!) The setting for the battle of Jhelum is represented in the "Punjab 3" map included with Alpha 10. For the meantime, Persians replace the Mauryan Indians on this map, but this will be corrected as we include the Mauryans in 0 A.D. within the next few alphas.


For the next alpha, we welcome fan suggestions for words relating to the ancient world beginning with the letter K. Keep it original and within the 0 A.D. time-frame (appx. 500 BC - 1 BC)!


Long Time, No Siege


Wildfire Games will keep releasing new versions of 0 A.D. from time to time. Watch our news feed to get updates, or follow us by e-mail, RSS, Facebook or Twitter. And you're always welcome to join the 0 A.D. community on our forums.


Posted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted Image

Contact info for press, bloggers, etc.: aviv@wildfireHYDASPESgames.com without the Greek name of this alpha version written in all caps.


  • 1

Aviv Sharon [ aka Jeru ]

Wildfire Games 0 A.D. PR & Social Media Contributor
Contact me:
E-mail & Google Talk: aviv dot sharon at gmail dot com
MSN: lc_jerusalem at hotmail dot com
Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn


#2 ribez

ribez

    Duplicarius

  • Community Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 282 posts

Posted 16 May 2012 - 04:10 PM

great :banana:

Edited by ribez, 16 May 2012 - 05:03 PM.

  • 0

#3 Sef

Sef

    Discens

  • Community Members
  • Pip
  • 39 posts

Posted 16 May 2012 - 06:48 PM

Congratz on alpha 10, its a really big step from 9. Keep up the good work guys!
  • 0

#4 hhyloc

hhyloc

    Duplicarius

  • Community Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 244 posts

Posted 17 May 2012 - 01:15 AM

Finally it's here! :victory: :)
  • 0

#5 oshron

oshron

    Centurio

  • Community Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 922 posts

Posted 17 May 2012 - 05:00 AM

incredible! i was never expecting the mauryan indians to make the cut for part 1!

but now you guys should come up with an eighth civ for a nice, even number ;) 1-2 is too few, 3-4 is okay, 5-6 is ideal, 7 is NOT OKAY, 8 is AWESOME XDDDDD

do you think you'll make more factions within the other civs, depending? i had always thought that there would be just two divergences for each faction where divergences were included, but since theres now going to be three for the hellenes, what about other potential divergences? like the scots/picts, perhaps?
  • 1
Hey! Check out the plans for my mythology mod on my site! Post input and comments in the discussion thread!

#6 Mythos_Ruler

Mythos_Ruler

    Senator

  • WFG Retired
  • 14,961 posts

Posted 17 May 2012 - 05:11 AM

incredible! i was never expecting the mauryan indians to make the cut for part 1!

but now you guys should come up with an eighth civ for a nice, even number ;) 1-2 is too few, 3-4 is okay, 5-6 is ideal, 7 is NOT OKAY, 8 is AWESOME XDDDDD

do you think you'll make more factions within the other civs, depending? i had always thought that there would be just two divergences for each faction where divergences were included, but since theres now going to be three for the hellenes, what about other potential divergences? like the scots/picts, perhaps?

The obvious easy choice would be to split the Celts into Gauls and Britons.
  • 0

#7 hhyloc

hhyloc

    Duplicarius

  • Community Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 244 posts

Posted 17 May 2012 - 07:05 AM

The obvious easy choice would be to split the Celts into Gauls and Britons.

Great! I asked about this on ModDB but didn't get any answer, at last my wish was fulfilled :)
  • 0

#8 oshron

oshron

    Centurio

  • Community Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 922 posts

Posted 18 May 2012 - 12:26 AM

arent the celts already split into the gauls and britons, though? its just that, before, there were only two splits in any given civ (Macedonians vs. Poleis, Gauls vs. Britons, etc), i mean, like, more significant splits to other civs. i remember before that some people suggested that the persians could have one split going off into the armenians (speaking of persians, i would personally suggest changing the official name to "Achaemenids" if there's plans to include another persian civ in part2

and if youre gonna include more than two splits for a given civ, then what will the maximum be? personally, id recommend four, and maybe include the Syracusans as another split for the greeks (iirc, it was suggested a long time ago that the rise of syracuse could be used as the learning campaign when it gets to that)

Edited by oshron, 18 May 2012 - 12:28 AM.

  • 0
Hey! Check out the plans for my mythology mod on my site! Post input and comments in the discussion thread!

#9 Mythos_Ruler

Mythos_Ruler

    Senator

  • WFG Retired
  • 14,961 posts

Posted 18 May 2012 - 12:33 AM

No. I meant have separate factions: Gauls and Britons. We've essentially abandoned the sub-faction idea in favor of more full factions.
  • 0

#10 OrganicHallucinosis

OrganicHallucinosis

    Discens

  • Community Members
  • Pip
  • 25 posts

Posted 18 May 2012 - 01:01 AM

i remember before that some people suggested that the persians could have one split going off into the armenians (speaking of persians, i would personally suggest changing the official name to "Achaemenids" if there's plans to include another persian civ in part2


They(Armenians) where certainly unique enough. The Hayasdan would have the mounted power of the Sarmatians and Skythians, but with all the perks of a settled nation too. Hayasdan would have Light Cavalry Archers, Armoured Cavalry Archers, Cataphracts, Spearmen, Armoured Spearmen and competent bowmen. The thing is though, why would they include a relatively minor nation like Armenia when they can include heavy hitters like Skythia, Odrysia(or Dacia), Germania, Ptolemaioi, or the Seleucids?
  • 0

#11 Mythos_Ruler

Mythos_Ruler

    Senator

  • WFG Retired
  • 14,961 posts

Posted 18 May 2012 - 01:08 AM

Or Pontus, Pergamon, and the Lusitanians. :)
  • 0

#12 hhyloc

hhyloc

    Duplicarius

  • Community Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 244 posts

Posted 18 May 2012 - 02:14 AM

I have a question: Since we got Athenians, Spartans and Macedonians now, what will happen to the generic Hellenes faction?
  • 0

#13 Mythos_Ruler

Mythos_Ruler

    Senator

  • WFG Retired
  • 14,961 posts

Posted 18 May 2012 - 02:20 AM

I have a question: Since we got Athenians, Spartans and Macedonians now, what will happen to the generic Hellenes faction?

We'll probably keep them in some way and use them in scenarios and campaigns representing other free Greek factions, like the Achaean League, Aetolian League, Argives, etc. If we decide to do that (I'm leaning toward 'yes'), then we'll probably tweak them a little bit and make them more generic, by stripping out the specific heroes and champion units. Maybe replace the heroes with a generic "Strategos" and give them the Thureophoros and Thorakites as their champion units. Just spitballin' here.
  • 0

#14 Zeta1127

Zeta1127

    Duplicarius

  • Community Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 313 posts

Posted 18 May 2012 - 02:22 AM

I have a question: Since we got Athenians, Spartans and Macedonians now, what will happen to the generic Hellenes faction?

As I understand it, the Hellenes faction is no longer selectable for random maps, but are still available in some scenarios.

Edit: Mythos Ruler is way too fast.

Edited by Zeta1127, 18 May 2012 - 02:24 AM.

  • 0
"I'm just a simple man trying to make my way in the universe." - Jango Fett
"You are fooling yourself, Captain. Nothing here is what it seems. You are not the plucky hero, the Alliance is not an evil empire, and this is not the grand arena."
"And that's not incense." - The Operative and Inara Serra
"What you will see, if you leave the Mirror free to work, I cannot tell. For it shows things that were, and things that are, and things that yet maybe. But which it is that he sees, even the wisest cannot always tell. Do you wish to look?" - Galadriel
Clone Marshal Commander Zeta 1127 of the 89th Legion a.k.a. Zachary Skaggs

#15 wraitii

wraitii

    Primus Pilus

  • WFG Programming Team
  • 1,617 posts

Posted 18 May 2012 - 05:35 AM

Congratulations on the release, a lot of great work has been done since Alpha 9, for the better.
  • 0
Lancelot de Ferrière le Vayer [ aka Wraitii ]
Wildfire Games Programmer, AI developer, auxiliary map designer, dealing with anything water.
Contact me: wraitii@wildfiregames.com

Also the world's only three-dimensional poodle.

#16 oshron

oshron

    Centurio

  • Community Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 922 posts

Posted 18 May 2012 - 06:07 AM

personally, id keep the faction splits; i think it would keep the game simpler
  • 0
Hey! Check out the plans for my mythology mod on my site! Post input and comments in the discussion thread!

#17 OrganicHallucinosis

OrganicHallucinosis

    Discens

  • Community Members
  • Pip
  • 25 posts

Posted 18 May 2012 - 04:54 PM

By doing that your whitewashing one culture for the other. It would be similiar to merging the Iberians with the Gauls. The Britons and Gauls of the time where very different. As different as the Skythians from the Persians.

Edited by OrganicHallucinosis, 18 May 2012 - 04:55 PM.

  • 0

#18 oshron

oshron

    Centurio

  • Community Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 922 posts

Posted 18 May 2012 - 07:36 PM

By doing that your whitewashing one culture for the other. It would be similiar to merging the Iberians with the Gauls. The Britons and Gauls of the time where very different. As different as the Skythians from the Persians.

were the cultures whitewashed in AOM? my point is that, while the athenians and spartans are distinct from one another, at their core they are both still culturally greeks first and athenians or spartans second
  • 0
Hey! Check out the plans for my mythology mod on my site! Post input and comments in the discussion thread!

#19 fabio

fabio

    Centurio

  • WFG Programming Team
  • 638 posts

Posted 20 May 2012 - 12:33 PM

You may want to add Rise of the East civilisation which looks already almost complete.
  • 0

Graphics problems with 0 A.D. under Ubuntu and free drivers? Check out the Updated and Optimized Graphics Drivers Archive: includes updated drivers with fixes and improvements for games, including 0 A.D..


#20 Sonarpulse

Sonarpulse

    Sesquiplicarius

  • Community Members
  • PipPip
  • 166 posts

Posted 20 May 2012 - 06:20 PM

Eventually, when 0ad as planned is more-or-less complete, I think it would be neat to be able to chain together civilizations as an outgrowth of Civilization Phases. For example, you pick Athenians or Spartans, eventually become Macedonians, then Byzantines, then Turks.

Also, it would be nice so a civ can be defined as a collection of assets and tech trees, and then balance tweaking can be done separately based on the civs available. So 0ad becomes a certain collection of chained civs & ballence tweeks, and hypothetical "AD500" another, perhaps slightly overlapping, collection of chained civs & ballence tweeks.

Having all of history in one game like civilization seems ridiculous and hard to balance, but different ages can be balanced separately with assets shared.

Hope that makes sense.

Edited by Sonarpulse, 20 May 2012 - 06:28 PM.

  • 0
Posted ImagePosted ImagePosted Image